User talk:QuaternionMark/Archive

 ''The following discussion has been archived. ''' Please do not modify it. ' Subsequent comments should be added on the main talk page.

I went around the corner, the corner, the corner. I went around the corner and guess what I saw...I saw another corner, a corner, a corner. I saw another corner and guess what I did... TheIncredibleHibby (talk) 23:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)(damn you for getting that stuck in my head lkdfsxc)


 * No problem :) -- CommanderMark (Talk) 00:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Upcoming SCPs Page
Hello, I am just posting regarding the deletion of the page I just created. I realise it is fair to delete it as it isn't in the game, but I would like to question the validity of it. My only question is, why are there scrapped SCP's on the wiki? Do you think that a planned SCP's category would be wrong? --Not logged in, but my username is usually WillWow_mc or Lombax0987-1234. 16:56, 31 July 2013 (Timezone that Eastern Australia is in) — The preceding unsigned comment was added by


 * There's no point in adding pages for SCPs which may or may not actually be implemented in the future, for all you know it could just be a scrapped SCP. We only add pages for SCPs which are officially confirmed. Same thing applies to scrapped SCPs, we will only list them when there's confirmation that they were once going to be added and were cancelled for various reasons. For instance, v1.0 has code to suggest SCP-409 and 178 being implemented, but we're not gonna create pages for those, nor will we say they were cancelled.-- CommanderMark (Talk) 07:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Alright then. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by

Hydradark
I hope I didn't break too much stuff? If anything needs extra fixing, just let me know and I'll get to it! Tagaziel (talk) 06:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm still wondering why the change to the hydradark skin was needed. I understand that before this the wiki essentially had a white-turned-dark skin attached to it, but it was already set up just fine, so I don't see why the change was necessary. -- CommanderMark (Talk) 21:32, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm slow to answer when I don't get messages on my own end. The change was mostly for the sake of convenience, as the default dark styling works better with the wiki (and if someone happens on an unskinned element, it won't look out of the ordinary). Tagaziel (talk) 07:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Undead003's name
On the subject of undead003, I have to enforce the rule that personal information (such as name or address) has to be removed upon request. Sorry. Tagaziel (talk) 07:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * My only problem with it though is that I actually got his name from SCP - Containment Breach's publicly accessible credits file, which lists him amongst other voice actors/sound designers. I'd be more in favour of having his name removed if he first contacted the game's developer about removing it from there as well. Only removing it from the wiki though feels like censorship.


 * I believe juanjpro has already contacted Undead003 about this, and I've already notified Regalis (game's dev) to tell me if Undead ever actually asks him.


 * On the topic of actually removing his name, is having it displayed here without his consent a violation of a Gamepedia policy? I can understand why such a thing would be in place, but how does it apply when the information is taken from a primary source (The game itself in this case.)? If it still qualifies as a violation then I'd go along with removing it regardless of whether he contacts the developer.-- CommanderMark (Talk) 13:10, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * undead003 just told me that he already contacted Regalis about this issue, I think we can assume that he'll remove the name from the game's files. --Juanjpro (talk) 13:16, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not a violation per se, but we prefer to err on the side of caution. If a private person prefers to be known under their nickname, rather than their full details, I tend to accommodate them. I know a guy who uses an assumed name in addition to his nickname, due to a major stalking incident in the past, so I tend to accommodate these requests (unless there's a public interest in retaining them, but I doubt undead really does eat people's brains and has to be kept away from people at large ;)). Tagaziel (talk) 14:10, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Yeah, Regalis is removing my real name from the game's credits and replacing it with undead003. It should all be dealt with soon. Undead003 (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2016 (UTC)