Template talk:SCP nav

I noticed that 914 is under "harmful" but 294 is under "harmless"... I want to get opinions as for why these SCPs are under the categories they are. I personally argue for 294 being listed harmful just like 914, since they both have the potential to kill the player if messed with in the wrong ways. If it won't be put under harmful, then maybe consider 914 for being listed as harmless. Them being together would just make more sense (at least to me) for the above listed reasoning. TheIncredibleHibby (talk) 06:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * How about listing them under a new group (something like "Generators", maybe?), as they can be both just plain harmless, harmful and beneficial --Zabbie-kun (talk) 06:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, when we are referring to whether or not they're harmful we're asking if they can hurt the player. SCP-914 can hurt the player by entering its booth but SCP-294 does not harm the player itself which is why it's categorized under harmless.


 * @Zabinyan Eh...in my opinion every section should have at least 3 SCPs (only exception being the rejects). Perhaps maybe we could create a new section for Beneficial/Helpful SCPs and add 294, 500, 714, and 914?-- CommanderMark (Talk) 14:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


 * A Beneficial/Helpful category does sound pretty good imo.--TheIncredibleHibby (talk) 09:26, 9 November 2013 (UTC)